CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE
19 OF THE CONVENTION
Conclusions and recommendations of the Committee against Torture
C. United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
58. The Committee considered the second periodic report of the Government
of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and
on the United Kingdom and its dependent Territories (CAT/C/25/Add.6)
at its 234th and 235th meetings, on 17 November 1995 (CAT/C/SR.234
and 235), and has adopted the following conclusions and recommendations:
1. Introduction
59. The
Committee thanks the Government of the United Kingdom for its comprehensive
report, well-supported by annexed material. The Committee also wishes
to acknowledge the breadth of the United Kingdom representatives
and the way in which they encouraged a full and open dialogue between
themselves and the Committee.
2. Positive aspects
60. The
Committee is pleased to acknowledge the following positive aspects:
(a) An
in-country right of appeal for all refused asylum-seekers;
(b) The
use of tape recording for all interrogations by the police in England
and Wales, many interrogations in Scotland, and for non-terrorist-related
interrogations in Northern Ireland;
(c) The
introduction of Codes of Practice applied to the interrogations
of detainees in relation to terrorist activities in Northern Ireland;
(d) The
appointment of an Independent Commissioner for Holding (Detention)
Centres for Northern Ireland;
(e) The
appointment of an Independent Accusor of Military Complaints procedures
in Northern Ireland;
(f) The
renewal of the prison infrastructure throughout the United Kingdom;
(g) The
noticeable reduction of the level of violence of detainees in detention
centres of Northern Ireland;
(h) The
creation of an Independent Complaints Council to deal with complaints
against the police in Hong Kong;
(i) The
emphasis placed on education and training of police, prison and
immigration officers;
(j) The
appointment of a Prisons Ombudsman in 1994;
(k) The
present practice of permitting detainees in Northern Ireland, in
respect of terrorist-related offences, to consult in private counsel
which is considered by the Committee as a shift in the right direction;
(l) The
Committee notes that new Prison Rules have been drafted for Montserrat
and that they will likely be enacted within a few months;
(m) The
new suicide-prevention processes in the prison system;
(n) The
Committee notes with pleasure that no case of torture appears to
have come to light in the dependent Territories.
3. Factors and difficulties impeding the application
of the Convention
61. In
Northern Ireland the maintenance of the emergency legislation and
of separate detention or holding centres will inevitably continue
to create conditions leading to breach of the Convention. This is
particularly so because at present the practice of permitting legal
counsel to consult with their clients at their interrogations is
not yet permitted.
62. The
Committee regrets that invocation of the Convention by individuals
is not possible since the United Kingdom has not declared in favour
of article 22 of the Convention. This appears unusual given that
the United Kingdom has acceded to the jurisdiction of the European
Commission of Human Rights.
63. In
Hong Kong the warehousing of Vietnamese boat people in large detention
centres may bring the Government into conflict with article 16 of
the Convention.
4. Subjects of concern
64. The
Committee is concerned about the following:
(a) The
practice of vigorous interrogation of detainees under the emergency
powers, which may sometimes breach the Convention;
(b) The
method adopted in forcibly returning persons under deportation orders;
(c) The
rate of suicide in prisons and places of detention;
(d) The
renewal of emergency powers relating to Northern Ireland;
(e) The
practice of the refoulement of asylum-seekers in circumstances
that may breach article 3 of the Convention;
(f) The
practice of the army in Northern Ireland of dispersing, with plastic
bullets, what have been described by non-governmental organizations
as peaceful demonstrations;
(g) The
failure of the United Kingdom to declare in favour of article 22
both for itself and its overseas dependencies;
(h) The
failure to provide for counsel to be present during interrogation
in Northern Ireland for terrorist-related offences;
(i) The
standards of detention of the Vietnamese boat people in Hong Kong;
(j) The
allegations of discrimination in the treatment of Black citizens
in the United Kingdom by police and immigration authorities.
5. Recommendations
65. The
Committee recommends that the Government of the United Kingdom take
the following measures:
(a) Abolishing
detention centres in Northern Ireland and the repealing the emergency
legislation;
(b) Reviewing
of practices related to deportation or refoulement where
such practices may conflict with the State party's obligations under
article 3 of the Convention;
(c) Re-educating
and retraining police officers, particularly investigating police
officers, in Northern Ireland as a further step in the peace process;
(d) Training
immigration officers on how to manage violent prisoners with a minimum
at risk of harm to all those involved;
(e) Extending
the taping of interrogations to all cases and not merely those that
do not involve terrorist-related activities and in any event to
permit lawyers to be present at interrogations in all cases;
(f) Declaring
in favour of article 22 of the Convention and specifically on behalf
of Hong Kong and the other United Kingdom dependent Territories;
(g) Given
the need for prisons, continuing the present policy of rebuilding
in accordance with the most modern standards;
(h) Reviewing
the policies favouring private policing with a view to properly
regulating that activity;
(i) Reconsidering
corporal punishment with a view to determining if it should be abolished
in those dependencies that still retain it.