CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE
19 OF THE CONVENTION
Conclusions and recommendations of
the Committee against Torture
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Dependent
Territories
72. The Committee considered the third periodic report of the United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Dependent Territories
(CAT/C/44/Add.1) at its 354th, 355th and 360th meetings, held on 16
and 19 November 1998 (CAT/C/SR.354, 355 and 360) and has adopted the
following conclusions and recommendations:
1. Introduction
73. The third
periodic report of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern
Ireland was due on 6 January 1998 and was received on 2 April 1998.
In every respect it conformed to the guidelines of the Committee pertaining
to the preparation of such periodic reports. In particular the Committee
found it helpful to have its recommendations from the examination
of the second periodic report summarized at the outset together with
a short statement concerning the action the State party had taken
in that respect.
2. Positive
aspects
74. (a) The
enactment of the Human Rights Act, 1998;
(b) The
enactment of the Immigration Commission Act, 1998;
(c) The
"Peace Process" in Northern Ireland, pursuant to the Good Friday Agreement;
(d) The
removal of corporal punishment as a penalty in several of the Dependent
Territories.
3. Factors
and difficulties impeding the application of the provisions of the
Convention
75. The continuation
of the state of emergency in Northern Ireland, noting that no exceptional
circumstances can ever provide a justification for failure to comply
with the Convention.
4. Subjects
of concern
76. (a) The
number of deaths in police custody and the apparent failure of the
State party to provide an effective investigative mechanism to deal
with allegations of police and prison authorities' abuse, as required
by article 12 of the Convention, and to report publicly in a timely
manner;
(b) The
use of prisons as places in which to house refugee claimants;
(c) The
retention of detention centres in Northern Ireland, particularly Castlereagh
Detention Centre;
(d) The
rules of evidence in Northern Ireland that admit confessions of suspected
terrorists upon a lower test than in ordinary cases and in any event
permits the admission of derivative evidence even if the confession
is excluded;
(e) Sections
134 (4) and (5) (b) (iii) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, appear
to be in direct conflict with article 2 of the Convention;
(f) Sections
1 and 14 of the State Immunity Act, 1978, seem to be in direct conflict
with the obligations undertaken by the State party pursuant to articles
4, 5, 6 and 7 of the Convention;
(g) The
continued use of plastic bullet rounds as a means of riot control;
(h) The
dramatic increase in the number of inmates held in prisons in England
and Wales over the last three years.
5. Recommendations
77. (a) The
closure of detention centres, particularly Castlereagh, at the earliest
opportunity;
(b) The
reform of the State Immunity Act, 1978, to ensure that its provisions
conform to the obligations contained in the Convention;
(c) The
reform of sections 134 (4) and 5 (b) (iii) of the Criminal Justice
Act, 1988, to bring them into conformity with the obligations contained
in article 2 of the Convention;
(d) The
abolition of the use of plastic bullet rounds as a means of riot control;
(e) Reconstruction
of the Royal Ulster Constabulary so that it more closely represents
the cultural realities of Northern Ireland. This should continue to
be associated with an extensive programme of reĀeducation for members
of the Royal Ulster Constabulary directed at the objectives of the
Peace Accord and the best methods of modern police practices;
(f) The
Committee finally recommends that in the case of Senator Pinochet
of Chile, the matter be referred to the office of the public prosecutor,
with a view to examining the feasibility of and if appropriate initiating
criminal proceedings in England, in the event that the decision is
made not to extradite him. This would satisfy the State party's obligations
under articles 4 to 7 of the Convention and article 27 of the Vienna
Convention on the Law of Treaties of 1969.