CERD/C/FJI/CO/18-20
23 October 2012
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination
1.The Committee considered the eighteenth to twentieth periodic reports of Fiji (CERD/C/FJI/18-20), submitted in one document, at its 2181st and 2182nd meetings (CERD/C/SR.2181 and 2182), held on 15 and 16 August 2012. At its 2200th and 2201st meetings (CERD/C/SR.2200 and 2201), held on 30 August 2012, it adopted the following concluding observations.
2.The Committee welcomes the State party’s report, which is in conformity with the Committee’s guidelines on the content and form of reports. It appreciates the State party’s timeliness in submitting the report and the opportunity to engage in a constructive and frank dialogue with the State party. The Committee appreciates the efforts made by the delegation in responding to the questions and comments raised by Committee members.
3.The Committee notes with interest the involvement of civil society organizations in the reporting process.
4.The Committee welcomes the withdrawal of reservations and declarations to articles 2 to 6, 15 and 20 of the Convention on 10 August 2012.
5.The Committee welcomes efforts made by the State party towards the elimination of institutionalized racism and the establishment of democratic institutions, including the adoption of the Roadmap for Democracy and Sustainable Socio-Economic Development 2009-2014.
6.The Committee welcomes the establishment of the Constitution Review Commission for the elaboration of a new constitution and notes the commitment made by the State party to ensure the participation of all Fijians in the constitutional consultation process.
7.The Committee notes with interest a number of measures towards the elimination of racial discrimination in schools and promoting diversity, including the compulsory teaching of the iTaukei and Hindi languages.
8.The Committee notes the comment made by the State party that the prohibition of collecting data based on ethnicity (CERD/C/FJI/18-20, para. 6) was established in pursuance of the Committee’s previous recommendation (CERD/C/FJI/CO/17, para. 16), and was aimed at eliminating racial profiling, for example in immigration forms. However, the Committee regrets the lack of disaggregated data on the socioeconomic situation of members of ethnic groups as well as the lack of gender analysis of data provided (arts. 1 and 5).
Recalling its revised reporting guidelines (CERD/C/2007/1 , para . 11 ), the Committee reaffirms that i f progress in eliminating discrimination based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin is to be monitored, some indication of the number of persons who might be treated less favourably on the basis of these characteristics is needed. Also, the Committee recommends that in preparing data i n accordance with the Committee’s general recommendation No. 25 ( 2000 ) on gender-related dimensions of racial discrimination, the State party also take into acc ount gender issues which may intersect with racial discrimination , and provid e data disaggregated by gender.
In line with its general recommendation No. 8 (1990) on the interpretation and application of article 1 of the Convention , t he Committee recommends th at the State party ensure that data on the socioeconomic situation of the population by ethnicity is collected on a voluntary and self-identification basis . It requests that the State party include such disaggregated data in its next periodic report .
9.Despite some provisions in domestic law that may address racial discrimination, including the revised Public Order Act which prohibits racial vilification, the Committee regrets the lack of a definition of racial discrimination in line with article 1 as well as the non-compliance of existing legislation with article 4 of the Convention. The Committee notes with concern that the State party has not adopted comprehensive legislation to prevent and combat racial discrimination (arts. 1, 2 and 4).
Th e Committee reiterates its previous recommendation (CERD/C/ FJI /CO/ 17, para . 15) that the State party adopt comprehensive legislation on the elimination of racial discrimination that includes a definition of direct and indirect discrimination in line with article 1 of the Convention. The Committee also recommends that the State party ensure that its legislation is in full conformity with the provisions of article 4 of the Convention , including by establishing racial motives as an aggravating circumstance in the commission of crimes .
10.The Committee expresses its concern about the absence of complaints, prosecutions and convictions relating to ethnically or racially motivated crimes lodged with courts or with the Fiji Human Rights Commission despite reports of institutionalized or de facto racial discrimination in the country, including by law enforcement officials. The Committee is also concerned by the information regarding language barriers in court proceedings for minorities who do not speak English, iTaukei or Hindi (arts. 2, 4 and 6).
R ecalling its general recommendation No. 31 (2005) on the prevention of racial discrimination in the administration and functioning of the criminal justice system and noting that an absence of complaints cannot be taken to mean that none exist , the Committee recommends that the State party assess the reasons for the absence of complaints rela ting to racial discrimination and address them.
T he Committee requests that the State party provide in the next periodic report updated information on complaints about acts of racial discrimination and on relevant decisions in court proceedings and by the Fiji Human Rights Commission , including on remedies provided to victims. It also encourages the State party to raise the level of public awareness of national legal remedies in the field of racial discrimination , and to disseminate the Convention in different languages .
The Committee urges the State party to p rovide interpreters in court proceedings to minorities who are not speakers of the three common languages in order to guarantee the right of members of such minorities to a fair trial.
11.While taking note of the 2009 Human Rights Commission Decree establishing the Fiji Human Rights Commission, the Committee is concerned by the information according to which this institution has worked without a chairperson and commissioners since its inception and lacks appropriate resources to protect and promote rights under the Convention. It is also concerned that the selection and appointment process is based on the discretion of the President of Fiji (art. 2).
The Committee recommends that the State party provide the Fiji Human Rights Commission with adequate human and financial res ources to carry out its mandate and appoint a c hairperson and c ommissioners as soon as possible . The Committee encourages the State party to take all necessary measures to ensure the independence of the Commission by reinforcing its mandate in the new Constitution and revising the selection process in compliance with the p rinciples relating to the status of national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights ( Paris Principles ) .
12.The Committee takes note of the data provided by the State party on the representation of various groups of the population in public administration, police and the army. It reiterates its concern about the very low level of representation of minorities in public and political life. While taking note of the argument that recruitment is merit based (CERD/C/FJI/18-20, para. 28), the Committee is of the view that the State party should pay particular attention to the underrepresentation of minorities in public services, assess the reasons for this phenomenon and address it effectively (arts. 1, 2 and 5).
Reiterating its previous recommendations (CERD/C/FJI/CO/17, para . 18 ) and recalling its general recommendation No. 32 (2009) on the meaning and scope of special measures in the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination , the Committee recommends that the State party take special measures to improve the level of participation of persons belonging to minority groups in public administration and politics .
13.The Committee regrets the paucity of information on economic, social and cultural rights of persons belonging to less numerous minority groups. The Committee notes with concern that further efforts have yet to be taken to promote languages other than English, iTaukei and Hindi (arts. 5 and 7).
The Committee notes the commitment by the State party to assess the situation of the most vulnerable groups in need of specific assistance in order to take measures in allocating res o urces and designing appropriate programmes for their benefit. The Committee recommends that the State party promote minority culture and languages and include information on the economic, social and cultural rights of minorities in the next periodic report .
14.The Committee takes note of measures adopted by the State party in providing assistance on the basis of need rather than ethnicity, including various land use decrees to ensure equal access to land for all. It is however concerned by reports of insufficient consultation with and participation of indigenous people as regards issues affecting them, such as equitable rent for the use of its land. The Committee notes the information about the dissolution of the Great Council of Chiefs without prior consultation (arts. 2 and 5).
The Committee reaffirms the importance of securing the free, prior and informed consent o f indigenous groups regarding their permanent rights as a group, including issues affecting them and their way s of living . It urges the State party to enhance appropriate mechanisms for effective consultation with indigenous people around all policies affecting their identity, ways of living and resources , in line with the Convention, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and International Labour Organization Convention No. 169 (1991) concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries . The Committee requests the State party to clarify the issue relating to the dissolution of the Great Council of Chiefs.
15.The Committee regrets the absence of information on measures taken to address discrimination based on ethnicity and religion in the light of reports of religious intolerance, often linked with ethnicity. It is concerned by the information that some newspapers publish advertisements seeking tenants or house maids of a particular ethnicity or religion (art. 5).
Taking into account the intersectionality between ethnicity and religion, the Committee recommends that the State party assess possible double discrimination that members of ethnic minorities belonging to specific religious groups may face. It also encourages the State party to prohibit discriminatory advertisements and ensure equal enjoyment of fundamental rights and freedoms to all.
16.The Committee notes the absence of information on the concrete results of a number of policies on the elimination of racial discrimination in schools, including the change of school names that bore an ethnic connotation, and the school zoning policy (art. 5).
The Committee encourages the State party to evaluate its policies aimed at eliminating racial discrimination in access to education and include this information in its next periodic report. It encourages the State party to further promote training on ethnic, cultur al and religio u s diversity in the country and to integrate these into the school curriculum in order to promote interethnic friendship and solidarity .
17.Bearing in mind the indivisibility of all human rights, the Committee encourages the State party to consider ratifying those international human rights treaties which it has not yet ratified, in particular treaties the provisions of which have a direct bearing on the subject of racial discrimination, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966), the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) and the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families (1990).
18.In the light of its general recommendation No. 33 (2009) on follow-up to the Durban Review Conference, the Committee recommends that the State party give effect to the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, adopted in September 2001 at the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, taking into account the outcome document of the Durban Review Conference, held in Geneva in April 2009, when implementing the Convention in its domestic legal order. The Committee requests that the State party include in its next periodic report specific information on action plans and other measures taken to implement the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action at the national level.
19.The Committee recommends that the State party ratify the amendments to article 8, paragraph 6, of the Convention, adopted on 15 January 1992 at the Fourteenth Meeting of States Parties to the Convention and endorsed by the General Assembly in its resolution 47/111. In this connection, the Committee recalls General Assembly resolutions 61/148, 63/243 and 65/200, in which the Assembly strongly urged States parties to accelerate their domestic ratification procedures with regard to the amendment to the Convention concerning the financing of the Committee and to notify the Secretary-General expeditiously in writing of their agreement to the amendment.
20.The Committee recommends that the State party’s reports be made readily available and accessible to the public at the time of their submission, and that the observations of the Committee with respect to these reports be similarly publicized in the official and other commonly used languages, as appropriate.
21.In accordance with article 9, paragraph 1, of the Convention and rule 65 of its amended rules of procedure, the Committee requests the State party to provide information, within one year of the adoption of the present concluding observations, on its follow-up to the recommendations contained in paragraphs 12,13 and 14 above.
22.The Committee also wishes to draw the attention of the State party to the particular importance of the recommendations in paragraphs 8, 10 and 14above and requests the State party to provide detailed information in its next periodic report on concrete measures taken to implement these recommendations.
23.The Committee recommends that the State party submit its twenty-first and twenty-second periodic reports in a single document by10 February 2016, in accordance with the specific reporting guidelines adopted by the Committee at its seventy-first session (CERD/C/2007/1), and addressing all the points raised in the present concluding observations. The Committee also urges the State party to observe the page limit of 40 pages for treaty-specific reports (see HRI/GEN.2/Rev.6, chap. I, para. 19).