COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION
OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
Forty-third session
CONSIDERATION
OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES
UNDER ARTICLE 9 OF THE CONVENTION
Concluding
observations of the Committee on the
Elimination of Racial Discrimination
Nigeria
306. The tenth, eleventh and twelfth periodic reports of Nigeria,
submitted in one document (CERD/C/226/Add.9), were considered by the
Committee at its 993rd and 998th meetings, held on 6 and 10 August
1993 (see CERD/C/SR.993 and 998).
307. The reports were introduced by the representative of the State
party who indicated that with a population of over 88.5 million Nigeria
was the most populous black country in the world. The predominant
ethnic groups were the Hausa, Fulani, Yoruba and Ibo. Other major
ethnic groups included the Edo, Ibibio, Isoko, Urhobo, Itsekiri, Kanuri,
Nupe, Efik, Ijaw, Egbira, Idoma, Tiv, Kamiri, Chambe, Gwaris and Ekoi,
and there were over 200 smaller ethnic groups with their own culture
and traditions. Despite their ethnic, cultural and linguistic diversity,
Nigerians exhibited a cohesiveness that was a product of centuries
of trade, inter-marriage and other contacts.
308. The civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights
of all Nigerians, regardless of the race or minority to which they
belonged,
were ensured and protected by a number of institutions, such as
courts of law, which were independent of governmental control,
and the Public
Complaints Commissioner, whose office had been in existence for
two decades and who handled complaints from individuals, groups
and corporate
bodies. The Code of Conduct Bureau had been established to complement
the efforts of the Public Complaints Commissioner. The Nigerian
Law
Review Commission regularly reviewed national laws to bring them
into line with contemporary domestic issues and international legal
instruments.
Additionally, Nigeria had recently established a human rights monitoring
unit under the Federal Ministry of Justice in order to enhance
the
implementation
of human rights instruments and to receive petitions and complaints
on human rights violations. State governments had similar
units in their justice ministries.
309. Members of the Committee welcomed the resumption of dialogue
with Nigeria and expressed the hope that Nigeria's cooperation
with
the Committee would be regular in the future. They noted that the
report under consideration failed to answer the many questions
raised
during the consideration of the ninth periodic report and to comply
fully with the Committee's guidelines. They also regretted the
absence
of detailed information on the ethnic composition of Nigerian society,
which was crucial for the Committee's monitoring of the implementation
of the Convention. They requested additional information on the
numerous
internal conflicts and ethnic violence and their causes, and concerning
the recent suspension of basic guarantees for the enjoyment of
fundamental
human rights. Additional information was also requested as to especially
vulnerable groups,
such as the Ogoni, who were suffering from the degradation and
pollution of their lands as a result of oil exploitation
by multinational corporations, as well as from acts of the police
and oil companies. In the latter connection, members wished to
know
how the Government planned to accede to the demands of minorities
to manage their own economies and resources; what the effects of
the
Nigerian Enterprises Promotion Decree of 1989 (repealing the Indigenization
Decree of 1977) would be in regard to the participation of local
ethnic
groups in the exploitation of natural resources. They also wished
to have more detailed information concerning the impact of the
policy
of national unity on ethnic and religious minority groups in 30
states. They considered that the tense political situation in Nigeria,
which
was the result of many factors, not least ethnic and religious difficulties
which were surfacing, adversely affected the implementation of
the Convention, and they felt that the Committee should keep the
implementation
of the Convention by Nigeria under review, taking it up again at
its next session.
310. With respect to article 1 of the Convention, members asked what
the rights and guarantees of non-citizens were under the Constitution
and why a distinction was made in national legislation between citizens
of Nigeria by birth and other Nigerians.
311. In regard to article 2 of the Convention, members of the Committee
wished to know how the Government of Nigeria encouraged the formation
of integrationist multiracial organizations and movements, referred
to in paragraph 9 of the report, how those organizations functioned
and what their impact was on general government policy with respect
to the implementation of the Convention.
312. As far as article 3 of the Convention was concerned, members
of the Committee congratulated the Government of Nigeria on the steps
taken, especially at the international level, to implement its provisions,
but pointed out that Nigeria must also undertake to prevent, prohibit
and eradicate all practices of racial segregation in the territories
under its jurisdiction.
313. While noting that Section 39 of the Constitution of Nigeria
seemed to meet the requirements of article 4 of the Convention,
members of
the Committee indicated that the report did not explain how its
provisions were implemented. In addition, they pointed out that
the definition
of "seditious intention" did
not cover all the instances of racial discrimination contemplated
in article 4 and asked for further
clarification on that issue. Members felt that the system of special
courts and military tribunals was not compatible with the protection
of the rights set out in article 4 of the Convention. Furthermore,
clarification was sought of the reported proscription by a Decree
of 20 May 1992 of all ethnic, religious and regional associations
that had supported political candidates. Finally, members asked
whether
the Constitution prohibited the existence of racist organizations
or banned participation in such organizations.
314. Having emphasized that under article 5 of the Convention the
State had an obligation to guarantee the civil, political, economic,
social and cultural rights of the whole population and not just
of
citizens, members wished to receive more detailed information on
the implementation of all its provisions. They asked, in particular,
what
had been done to ensure the fair and equitable representation of
all ethnic groups in federal and states' Parliaments and what concrete
steps had been taken to achieve national reconciliation; what action
had been envisaged to prevent regional interference and the long-term
dissolution of local government councils; whether the right to
freedom
of opinion and expression was guaranteed by law; whether freedom
of movement and residence was permitted within the borders of the
State;
what the prospects were for increased
investment in employment, education and housing and what the Government
policy was in this regard.
315. In connection with article 6 of the Convention, members wished
to know whether victims of acts of racial discrimination had the right
to compensation; how human rights institutions, such as the office
of Ombudsman, functioned; to what extent those institutions were independent
and how far the Government responded to their recommendations.
316. With respect to article 7 of the Convention, members of the Committee
wished to know whether training was provided for officials who had
to deal with ethnic conflicts, with a view to eradicating prejudice
which lead to racial discrimination and to fostering understanding
and tolerance among racial and ethnic groups.
317. Replying to the questions asked and comments made, the representative
of the State party said that Nigeria would henceforth maintain
its
dialogue with the Committee and that every effort would be made
to submit the reports in time. The concept of national unity was
not
at variance with the existence of many ethnic groups. It was part
of the aspiration to forge a single nation so that all citizens
would
consider themselves Nigerians and put Nigeria first. It by no means
implied prohibition of the culture, language and traditions of
different
ethnic groups. The report did not contain data on the demographic
composition of Nigeria because such figures were not available;
the
population census carried out two years previously had not provided
for the collection of information on ethnic groups or religion,
in
order to prevent states from inflating
figures in order to increase their revenue from the Federal Government,
as had happened in the
past.
318. The representative provided the Committee with some information
on the institutional organization of the Nigerian Federal State
and
said that the past practice of states of depriving local governments
of the funds allocated to them by the Federal Government had been
eliminated by the direct transfer of 10 per cent to local governments.
The various conflicts referred to by members as ethnic or religious,
had in fact been triggered by economic factors, such as the land
question.
The way to control "ethnic" conflicts
was by tackling the underlying cause - the underdevelopment of
the country. The representative
provided further information with respect to the situation of the
Ogoni in Rivers State, pointing out that the Federal Government
gave
back to the oil-producing areas the 3 per cent of the total revenue
from oil exploitation reserved for their development, and 2.5 per
cent for the protection of the environment.
319. With regard to article 4 of the Convention, the representative
said that the Government discouraged people from forming political
parties based on religious or ethnic criteria, since such criteria
necessarily implied the exclusion of certain sections of the population;
any such party that gained power would be unrepresentative of the
whole nation that it ruled.
320. With respect to article 6 of the Convention, the representative
of the State party informed the Committee that the Nigerian legal
system did not prevent anyone who considered he had suffered racial
discrimination from seeking remedy through the courts. There were
three levels of courts: magistrate courts, High Courts and the Supreme
Court. Some states also had customary courts, such as Shariah courts,
for dealing with problems of custom and practice specific to certain
areas.
Concluding observations
321. At its 1008th meeting, held on 17 August 1993, the Committee
adopted the following concluding observations.
(a) Introduction
322. The Committee noted the submission of the report which, however,
did not fully comply with the Committee's revised guidelines on the
preparation of reports. The resumption of the dialogue with the representative
of Nigeria had contributed to a better understanding of the situation
in that country. The Committee hoped that in the future the State
party would comply with its obligations under article 9 of the Convention.
The Committee noted that, in response to questions asked and comments
made by members, some additional information had been provided orally
by the delegation. The Committee welcomed the Government's commitment
to supply it with additional written information.
(b) Positive aspects
323. The Committee noted with interest that, since its independence,
Nigeria had been striving to reconcile regional and religious tensions
and to accommodate the interests of diverse ethnic groups. The recent
creation of nine additional states within the Federal Republic of
Nigeria attested to that trend. The expected entry into force on 27
August 1993 of a new Constitution and transition from military to
civilian rule would enhance democratic development thus creating favourable
conditions for a more effective implementation of the Convention.
The Committee noted with appreciation the steps Nigeria had taken
at the international level to implement article 3 of the Convention.
(c) Factors and difficulties impeding the application of the Convention
324. The Committee noted that the advent of an elected government
would contributed to the improvement of the overall human rights situation
in the country, which, apart from a rather tense political situation,
was also considerably influenced by a severe economic crisis and continuing
interethnic or religious conflicts.
(d) Principal subjects of concern
325. The Committee expressed its concern over the ongoing interethnic
conflicts. The Committee was particularly concerned over reports that
the Nigerian Police Force had, in some circumstances of violence,
been ineffective in protecting the rights of civilians.
326. The Committee found that national legislation, particularly Section
50, paragraph (d), subsection (21), of the Nigerian Criminal Code,
did not fully meet the requirements of article 4 of the Convention
and that the provisions of article 5 of the Convention were not adequately
implemented.
(e) Suggestions and recommendations
327. The Committee recommended that national legislation be brought
into full compliance with the provisions of the Convention, in particular
regarding a definition of racial discrimination (article 1 of the
Convention); prohibition of racist organizations and propaganda activities
that promote and incite racial discrimination (article 4 (b) of the
Convention); the effective enjoyment of the rights set forth in article
5 of the Convention; and the provision of effective protection and
remedies to everyone within the jurisdiction of the State party against
any acts of racial discrimination (article 6 of the Convention).
328. Furthermore, the Committee requested that in its next report
the Government of Nigeria should provide it with better data on the
ethnic composition of the society.
329. In the light of all information available to it, the Committee
found that the actual situation in Nigeria warranted a closer monitoring
of the implementation of the Convention and decided to request the
Government of Nigeria to provide the Committee with additional information
to be considered by the Committee at its spring session in 1994.