ALGERIA
1. The Committee considered the initial report of Algeria (CCPR/C/62/Add.1)
at its 1125th and 1128th meetings, held on 25 and 27 March 1992,
and adopted (at the 1147th meeting, held on 9 April 1992) the
following comments:
A. Introduction
2. The Committee notes that the dialogue with the Algerian delegation
was particularly constructive, because the delegation endeavoured
to answer members' questions candidly without trying to conceal
the difficulties. It thanks the State party through the latter's
representative for its good report, which was submitted within
the specified period. The report contains detailed information
on the laws and regulations relating to the application of the
provisions of the Covenant. The Committee regrets, however, that
the report includes little information concerning the actual application
of human rights standards. It also regrets the failure of the
report to indicate the factors and difficulties which are impeding
the application of those standards. Lastly, it notes with regret
that the report, having been submitted on 5 April 1991, could
make no reference to the states of emergency, notification of
which reached the Secretary-General on 19 June and 13 February
1992 respectively.
B. Positive aspects
3. The Committee notes with satisfaction that Algeria has ratified
or acceded to a number of international human rights instruments,
in particular the Covenant and the first Optional Protocol thereto,
and has made the declaration provided for in article 41 of the
Covenant. In addition, Algeria has included in its Constitution
various provisions relating to human rights and has amended a
number of legislative texts in order to reflect international
human rights standards. The Committee also notes with satisfaction
the establishment of a Ministry of Human Rights later replaced
by a national human rights monitoring body.
C. Factors and difficulties impeding the application of the
Covenant
4. The Committee notes that at the time of the submission of
the report, Algeria was in a process of transition to democracy.
Since that time, Algeria has been faced with substantial difficulties
which have brought this process to a standstill. The Algerian
authorities therefore considered such ways and means as seemed
to them appropriate in order to prevent forces that they considered
hostile to democracy from taking advantage of democratic procedure
in order to harm democracy. Among the measures adopted in this
respect are the proclamation of the two states of emergency and
the interruption of the electoral process.
D. Principal subjects of concern
5. The Committee expresses its concern regarding the suspension
of the democratic process and, in general, regarding the blocking
of democratic mechanisms. It is concerned about the high number
of arrests (8,800) and the abusive use of firearms by members
of the police in order to disperse demonstrations. The Committee
expresses doubts about respect for due process, especially before
military tribunals, about the real possibilities for implementing
the right to a fair trial, about the numerous cases of torture
and ill-treatment which have been brought to its attention, and
about the restrictions on rights to freedom of opinion and expression
and freedom of the press. The Committee further considers that,
in the light of the provision of article 6 requiring States parties
which have not abolished the death penalty to reserve it for the
most serious crimes, it is contrary to the Covenant to impose
the death penalty for crimes which are of an economic nature.
6. The Committee also regrets the many cases of discrimination
against women and the non-recognition of minorities, especially
the Berbers.
E. Suggestions and recommendation
7. The Committee recommends that Algeria put an end as promptly
as possible to the exceptional situation which prevails within
its borders and allow all the democratic mechanisms to resume
their functioning under fair and free conditions. It draws the
attention of the State party to the fact that the Covenant does
not permit derogation from certain rights even in times of emergency
and that, therefore, any excesses relating to, inter alia,
the right to life, torture and the right to freedom of conscience
and expression are violations of the Covenant which should not
be allowed to continue. The Committee hopes that the State party
will make an evaluation of the application of the provisions of
the Covenant after the report was written and would like to be
kept informed of any charges in the situation and of all future
developments.