20 August 2014
CCPR/C/JPN/CO/6
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Human Rights Committee
The Committee considered the sixth periodic report submitted by Japan (CCPR/C/JPN/6) at its 3080th and 3081st meetings (CCPR/C/SR.3080 and CCPR/C/SR.3081), held on 15 and 16 July 2014. At its 3091st and 3092nd meetings (CCPR/C/SR.3091 and CCPR/C/SR.3092), held on 23 July 2014, it adopted the following concluding observations.
The Committee welcomes the submission of the sixth periodic report of Japan and the information presented therein. It expresses appreciation for the opportunity to renew its constructive dialogue with the State party’s delegation on the measures that the State party has taken during the reporting period to implement the provisions of the Covenant. The Committee is grateful to the State party for its written replies (CCPR/C/JPN/Q/6/Add.1) and supplementary information to the list of issues, which were supplemented by the oral responses provided by the delegation, and for the supplementary information provided to it in writing.
The Committee welcomes the following legislative and institutional steps taken by the State party:
(a)The adoption of the Action Plan to Combat Trafficking in Persons, in December 2009;
(b)The approval of the Third Basic Plan for Gender Equality, in December 2010;
(c)The amendment of the Publicly Operated Housing Act in 2012, to the effect that same-sex couples are no longer excluded from the publicly operated housing system;
(d)The amendment of the Nationality Act in 2008 and of the Civil Code in 2013, which removed discriminatory provisions against children born out of wedlock.
The Committee welcomes the ratification by the State party of the following international instruments:
(a)International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, in 2009;
(b)Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, in 2014.
The Committee is concerned that many of the recommendations made after the consideration of the State party’s fourth and fifth periodic reports have not been implemented.
The State party should give effect to the recommendations adopted by the Committee that are contained in the present concluding observations , as well as those in its previous concluding observations.
While noting that treaties ratified by the State party have the effect of domestic law, the Committee is concerned at the restricted number of cases in which the rights protected under the Covenant have been applied by courts (art. 2).
The Committee reiterates its recomme ndation ( see CCPR/C/JPN/CO/5, para. 7) and calls up on the State party to ensure that the application and interpretation of the Covenant form part of the professional training of lawyers, judges and prosecutors at all levels, including the lower instances. T he State party should also ensure that effective remedies are available for violations of the rights protected under the Covenant . The State party should consider acceding to the Optional Protocol to the Covenant , which provid es for an in dividual communication procedur e.
The Committee notes with regret that, since the abandonment in November 2012 of the Human Rights Commission Bill, the State party has not made any progressto establish a consolidated national human rights institution(art. 2).
The Committee recalls its previous recommendation ( see CCPR/C/JPN /CO/5, para. 9) and recommends that the S tate party re consider s establishing a n independent na tional human rights institution with a broad human rights mandate, and provide s it with adequate financial and human resources, i n line with the principles relating to the status of national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights (the Paris principles ) (General Asse mbly resolution 48/134, annex).
The Committee is concerned at the State party’s continuing refusal to amend the discriminatory provisions of the Civil Code that prohibit women from remarrying in the six months following divorce and establish a different age of marriage for men and women, on the grounds that it could “affect the basic concept of the institution of marriage and that of the family” (arts. 2, 3, 23 and 26).
The State party should ensure that stereotypes regarding the roles of women and men in the family and in society are not used to justify violations of women ’ s r ight to equality before the law. The State party should, therefore, take urgent action to amend the Civil Code accordingly.
While welcoming the adoption of the Third Basic Plan for Gender Equality, the Committee is concerned at its limited impact, in view of the low levels of women carrying out political functions. The Committee regrets the lack of information regarding the participation of minority women, including Buraku women, in policymaking positions. It is concerned about reports that women represent 70 per cent of the part-time workforce and earn on average 58 per cent of the salaries received by men for equivalent work. The Committee is also concerned at the lack of punitive measures against sexual harassment and the dismissal of women as a result of pregnancy and childbirth (arts. 2, 3 and 26).
The State party should effectively monitor and assess the progress of the Third Basic Plan for Gender Equality and take prompt action to increase the participation of women in the public sector , including through temporary special measures , such as statutory quota s in political parties . It should take concrete measures to assess and support the political participation of minority women, including Buraku women, promote the recruitment of women as full-time workers and re d ouble its efforts to close the wage gap between men and women . It should also take the necessary legislative measures to criminali z e sexual harassment and to prohibit and sanction , with appropriate penalties , unfair treatment based on pregnancy and childbirth .
The Committee regrets that, despite its previous recommendations, the State party has not made any progress in broadening the scope of the definition of rape in the Criminal Code, setting the age of sexual consent above 13 years and prosecuting rape and other sexual offencesex officio. It notes with concern that domestic violence remains prevalent, that the process to issue protection orders is too lengthy and that the number of perpetrators who are punished for that offence is very low. The Committee is concerned by reports of the insufficient protection provided to same-sex couples and immigrant women (arts. 3, 6, 7 and 26).
In li ne with the Committee’s previous recommendations ( see CCPR/C/JPN/CO/5, para s . 1 4 and 1 5 ) the State party should take concrete action to prosecute rape and other crimes of sexual violence ex officio , rais e without further delay the age of consent for sexual activities and review th e elements of the crime of rape, as established in the Third Basic Plan for Gender Equality . The State party should intensify its efforts to ensure that all reports of domestic violence, including in same-sex couples , are thoroughly investigated ; that perpetrators are prosecuted and , if convicted, punished with appropriate sanctions ; and that victims have access to adequate protection , including through the granting of emergency protective orders and preventing i mmigrant wome n who are victims of sexual violence from losing their visa status.
The Committee is concerned about reports of social harassment and stigmatization of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons and discriminatory provisions that exclude same-sex couples from the municipally operated housing system (arts. 2 and 26).
The State party should adopt comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation that prohibits discrimination on all grounds, including sexual orientation and gender identity , and provide s victims of discrimination with effective and appropriate remedies . The State party should intensify its awareness - raising activities to combat stereotypes and prejudice against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons, investigate allegations of harassment against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons and take appropriate measures to prevent such stereotypes, prejudice and harassment . It should also remove the remaining restrictions in terms of eligibility criteria applied to same-sex couples with respect to publicly operated housing services at the municipal level.
The Committee expresses concern at the widespread racist discourse against members of minority groups, such as Koreans, Chinese or Burakumin, inciting hatred and discrimination against them, and the insufficient protection granted against those acts in the Criminal and Civil Codes. The Committee also expresses concern at the high number of extremist demonstrations authorized, the harassment and violence perpetrated against minorities, including against foreign students, and the open display in private establishments of signs such as those reading “Japanese only” (arts. 2, 19, 20 and 27).
The State should prohibit all propaganda advocating racial superiority or hatred that incites discrimination, hostility or violence, and should prohibit demonstrations that are intended to disseminate such propaganda. The State party should also allocate sufficient resources for awareness-raising campaigns against racism and in creas e its efforts to ensure that judges, prosecutors and police officials are trained to detect hat e and racially motivated crimes. The State party should also t ak e all necessary steps to prevent racist attacks and to ensure that the alleged perpetrators are thoroughly investigated , prosecuted and, if convicted, punished with appropriate sanctions .
The Committee remains concerned that several of the 19 capital offences do not comply with the Covenant’s requirement of limiting capital punishment to the “most serious crimes”, that death row inmates are still kept in solitary confinement for periods of up to 40 years before execution, and that neither the inmates nor their families are given prior notice of the day of execution. The Committee notes, furthermore, that the confidentiality of meetings between death row inmates and their lawyers is not guaranteed, that the mental examinations to determine whether persons facing execution are “in a state of insanity” are not independent and that requests for a retrial or pardon do not have the effect of staying the execution and are not effective. Moreover, reports that the death penalty has been imposed on various occasions as a result of forced confessions, including in the case of Iwao Hakamada, are a matter of concern(arts. 2, 6, 7, 9 and 14).
The State party should:
(a) Give due consideration to the abolition of death penalty or, in the alternative, reduce the number of eligible crimes for capital punishment to the most serious crimes that result i n the loss of life ;
(b) Ensure that the death row regime does not amount to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment o r punishment by giving reasonable advance notice of the scheduled date and time of execution to death row inmates and their families and refraining from imposing solitary confinement on death row prisoners except in the most exceptional circumstances and for strictly limited periods ;
(c) Immediately strengthen the legal safeguards against wrongful sentencing to death , inter alia , by guaranteeing to the defen c e full access to all prosecution materials and ensuring that confessions obtained by torture or ill-treatment are not invoked as evidence;
(d) In light of the Committee’s previous concluding observations ( see CCPR/C/JPN/CO/5, para. 1 7) , e stablish a mandatory and effective system of review in capital cases, with request s for retrial or pardon having a suspensive effect , and guaranteeing the strict confidentiality of all meetings between death row inmates and their lawyers concerning requests for retrial;
( e ) Establish an independent mechanism to review the mental health of death row inmates ;
(f) C onsider acceding to the Second Optional Protocol to the Covenant , aiming at the abolition of the death penalty.
The Committee is concerned by the State party’s contradictory position that the“comfort women” were not “forcibly deported” by Japanese military during wartime but that the “recruitment, transportation and management”of women in comfort stations was done in many cases against their will, through coercion and intimidation by the military or entities acting on behalf of the military. The Committee considers that any such acts carried out against the will of the victims are sufficient to consider them as human rights violations involving the direct legal responsibility of the State party. The Committee is also concerned about revictimization of the former “comfort women” by attacks on their reputations, including by public officials, and some that are encouraged by the State party’s equivocal position.The Committee takes into account information that all claims for reparation brought by victims before Japanese courts have been dismissed, and all complaints to seek criminal investigation and prosecution against perpetrators have been rejected on the ground of the statute of limitations. The Committee considers that this situation reflects ongoing violations of the victims’ human rights, as well as a lack of effective remedies available to them as victims of past human rights violations (arts. 2, 7 and 8).
The State party should take immediate and effective legislative and administrative measures to ensure :
( a ) T hat all allegations of sexual slavery or other human rights violations perpetrated by the Japanese military during wartime against the “comfort women” are effectively, independently and impartially i nvestigated and that perpetrators are prosecuted and , if found guilty, punished;
( b ) A ccess to justice and full reparation to victims and their families;
( c ) T he disclosure of all available evidence;
( d ) E ducation of students and the general public about the issue, including adequate reference s in textbooks ;
( e ) T he expression of a public apology and official recognition of the responsibility of the State party;
( f ) C ondemnation of any attempts to defame victims or to deny the events.
While appreciating the efforts made by the State party to address trafficking in persons, the Committee remains concerned about the persistence of the phenomenon, as well as about the low number of prison sentences imposed on perpetrators, the fact that no perpetrators of forced labour have been brought to justice, the decline in victim identification and the insufficient support granted to victims (art. 8).
In line with the Committee’s previous concluding observations ( see CCPR/C/JPN/CO/5, para. 23 ), the State party should:
(a) Enhance victim identification procedures, particularly with regard to victims of forced labour, and provide speciali z ed training to all law enforcement officers, including labour inspectors;
(b) V igorously investigate and prosecute perpetrators and, when convicted, impos e penalties that are commensurate with the seriousness of the acts committed ;
(c) Enhance the current victim protection measures, including interpretation services and legal support for claiming compensation .
The Committee notes with concern that, despite the legislative amendment extending the protection of labour legislation to foreign trainees and technical interns, there are still a large number of reports of sexual abuse, labour-related deaths and conditions that could amount to forced labour in the technical intern training programme (arts. 2 and 8).
In line with the Committee’s previous concluding observations ( see CCPR/C/JPN/CO/5, para . 24), the State party should strongly consider replacing the current programme with a new scheme that focuses on capacity - building rather than recruiting low-paid labour. In the meantime, the State party should increase the number of on-site inspections, establish an independent complaint mechanism and effectively investigate, prosecute and sanction labour trafficking cases and other labour violations.
The Committee is concerned that a large number of persons with mental disabilities are subject to involuntary hospitalization on very broad terms and without access to an effective remedy to challenge violations of their rights and that hospitalization is reportedly prolonged unnecessarily by the absence of alternative services (arts. 7 and 9).
The State party should:
(a) Increase community-based or alternative services for persons with mental disabilities ;
(b) Ensure that forced hospitalization is imposed only as a last resort, for the minimum period required, and only when necessary and proportionate for the purpose of protecting the person in question from harm or preventing injury to others ;
( c ) Ensure an effective and independent monitoring and reporting system for mental institutions, aim ed at effectively investigating and sanctioning abuses and providing compensation to victims and their families.
The Committee regrets that the State party continues to justify the use of the Daiyo Kangoku by citing the lack of available resources and the efficiency of the system for criminal investigations. The Committee remains concerned that the absence of an entitlement to bail or a right to State-appointed counsel prior to the indictment reinforces the risk of extracting forced confessions in Daiyo Kangoku. Moreover, the Committee expresses concern at the absence of strict regulations regarding the conduct of interrogations and regrets the limited scope of mandatory video recording of interrogations proposed in the 2014 “report for reform plan” (arts. 7, 9, 10 and 14).
T he S tate party should take all measures to abolish the substitute detention system or ensure that it is fully compliant with all guarantees in articles 9 and 14 of the Covenant, inter alia , by guaranteeing:
( a ) That alternatives to detention, such as bail , are duly considered during pre-indictment detention;
(b ) That all suspects are guaranteed the right to counsel from the moment of apprehension and that defence counsel is present during interrogations;
(c ) Legislative measures setting strict time limits for the duration and methods of interrogation, which should be entirely video-recorded;
(d ) A complaint review mechanism that is independent of the prefectural public safety commissions and has the authority to promptly, impartially and effectively investigate allegations of torture and ill-treatment during interrogation.
The Committee expresses concern about reported cases of ill-treatment during deportations, which resulted in the death of a person in 2010. The Committee is also concerned that, despite the amendment to the Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act, the principle of non-refoulement is not implemented effectively in practice. The Committee is further concerned at the lack of an independent appeal mechanism with suspensive effect against negative decisions on asylum, as well as at the prolonged periods of administrative detention without adequate giving of reasons and without independent review of the detention decision (arts. 2, 7, 9 and 13).
(a) T ake all appropriate measures to guarantee that im migrants are not subject t o ill-treatment during their deportation ;
(b) E nsure that all persons applying for international protection are given access to fair procedures for determination and for protection against refoulement and have access to an independent appeal mechanism with suspensive effect against negative decisions;
( c ) Take measures to ensure that detention is resorted to for the shortest appropriate period and only if the existing alternatives to administrative detention have been duly considered and that im migrants are able to bring proceedings before a court that will decide on the lawfulness of their detention .
The Committee is concerned about reports on widespread surveillance of Muslims by law enforcement officials (arts. 2, 17 and 26).
The State party should :
(a) Train law enforcement personnel on cultural awareness and the inad missibility of racial profiling , including the widespread surveillance of Muslims by law enforcement officials ;
(b) Ensure that affected persons have access to effective rem edies in cases of abuse.
The Committee is concerned at reports of abductions and forced confinement of converts to new religious movements by members of their families in an effort to de-convert them (arts. 2, 9, 18, 26).
T he State party should take effective measures to guarantee the right of every person not to be subject to coercion that would impair his or her freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief .
The Committee reiterates its concern that the concept of “public welfare” is vague and open-ended and may permit restrictions exceeding those permissible under the Covenant (arts. 2, 18 and 19).
The Committee recalls its previous concluding observations ( see CCPR/C/JPN/CO/5, para. 10) and urges the State party to refrain from imposing any restriction on the rights to freedom of thought, conscience and religion or freedom of expression unless they fulfil the strict conditions set out in paragraph 3 of article s 18 and 19 .
The Committee is concerned that the recently adopted Act on the Protection of Specially Designated Secrets contains a vague and broad definition of the matters that can be classified as secret and general preconditions for classification, and sets high criminal penalties that could generate a chilling effect on the activities of journalists and human rights defenders (art. 19).
The State party should t ake all necessary measures to ensure that the Act on the Protection of Specially Designated Secrets and its application conform to the strict requirements of article 19 of the Covenant, inter alia by guaranteeing that :
(a) The categories of information that could be classified are narrowly defined and any restriction on the right to seek, receive and impart information complies with the principles of legality, proportionality and necessity to prevent a specific and identifiable threat to national security;
( b ) No individual is punished for disseminating information of legitimate public interest that does not harm national security.
The Committee is concerned that the high threshold of exposure level set by the State party in Fukushima and the decision to cancel some of the evacuation areas give people no choice but to return to highly contaminated areas (arts.6, 12 and19).
The State party should take all the necessary measures to protect the life of the people affected by the nuclear disaster in Fukushima and lift the designation of contaminated locations as evacuation areas only where the radiation level does not place the residents at risk. The State party should monitor the levels of radiation and disclose th at information to the people affected in a timely manner.
The Committee observes that corporal punishment is only prohibited explicitly in schools, and expresses concern at its prevalence and social acceptance (arts.7 and24).
The State party should take practical steps, including through legislative measures , where appropriate, to put an end to corporal punishment in all settings. It should encourage non-violent forms of discipline as alternatives to corporal punishment, and should conduct public information campaigns to raise awareness about its harmful effects .
While welcoming the recognition of the Ainu as an indigenous group, the Committee reiterates its concern regarding the lack of recognition of the Ryukyu and Okinawa, as well as of the rights of those groups to their traditional land and resources and the right of their children to be educated in their language (art. 27).
The State party should take further steps to revise its legislation and fully guarantee the right s of Ainu , Ryukyu and Okinawa communities to their traditional land and nat ural resources, ensuring respect for the ir right to engage in free, prior and informed participation in polic ies that affect them and facilitat ing , to the extent possible, education for their children in their own language .
The State party should widely disseminate the Covenant, the text of its sixth periodic report, the written replies to the list of issues drawn up by the Committee and the present concluding observations among the judicial, legislative and administrative authorities, civil society and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) operating in the country, as well as the general public.
In accordance with rule 71, paragraph 5, of the Committee’s rules of procedure, the State party should provide, within one year, relevant information on its implementation of the Committee’s recommendations made in paragraphs 13, 14, 16 and 18 above.
The Committee requests the State party to provide, in its next periodic report, which is due for submission by 31 July 2018, specific, up-to-date information on the implementation of all its recommendations and on the Covenant as a whole. The Committee also requests the State party, when preparing its next periodic report, to broadly consult civil society and NGOs operating in the country.