26/ At its 1443rd meeting
(fifty-fourth session), held on 27 July 1995.
1. Introduction
The Committee appreciates
the opportunity to resume its dialogue with the State party. It regrets,
however, that the State party report was not satisfactory in that it
failed to provide detailed information on the actual implementation
in practice of the provisions of the Covenant. Moreover, the Committee,
while welcoming the updated additional information prepared by the Government
and presented to the Committee, notes that the lateness of its submission
did not allow for wide distribution, including its availability in all
the working languages of the Committee. Notwithstanding this point,
the Committee wishes to express its gratitude to the delegation for
the supplementary information it provided orally in answer to both the
written and oral questions posed by members of the Committee.
2. Factors and difficulties affecting the implementation of the Covenant
The Committee recognizes and appreciates the firm commitment of the Government
to a durable and peaceful solution to the conflict in the north and east
of the country. In view of the considerable efforts undertaken by the
Government to initiate and bring peace to the island, the Committee deeply
regrets the breakdown of the negotiations and the resumption of armed
conflict. The return of hostilities has given rise to serious violations
of human rights on both sides, thus adversely affecting the application
of the Covenant.
3. Positive aspects
The Committee welcomes
the initiatives being undertaken by the Government to further the protection
and promotion of human rights. In this respect the Committee notes that
a package of constitutional reforms is in the process of preparation.
The Committee notes that draft proposals are currently under consideration
for establishing a new procedure for direct petitioning to the Supreme
Court in the case of the infringement of fundamental rights and for
broadening the scope of local standings in such cases so as to permit
a non-governmental organization to file a petition before the Supreme
Court.
The Committee further welcomes
the enactment of Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration (Amendment)
Act No. 26 of 1994, which provides for more direct public access to
the Ombudsman. In addition, the Committee notes that the final report
by the Committee appointed to inquire into matters relating to persons
detained under the Prevention of Terrorism Act and the Emergency Regulations
has recommended the immediate revocation of detention orders relating
to 140 persons whom the Attorney General has decided not to prosecute.
The appointment of a Commission to inquire into election-related violence
is also noted.
The Committee expresses
its satisfaction at the Government's stated policy of not implementing
death sentences and that corporal punishment as a penalty has been suspended
for the last 10 years.
The Committee notes with
satisfaction the important role being played by non-governmental organizations
in Sri Lanka in contributing to the reform of laws protecting human
rights, for example with respect to the recent amendment of regulations
under Section 5 of the Public Security Ordinance, by which members of
the armed forces and the police have been directed to issue "arrest
receipts" even in the case where such information has not been
requested by the interested parties, such as family members.
The Committee welcomes
the recent adoption of an Act establishing the National Human Rights
Commission of Sri Lanka. It also welcomes the establishment of the Human
Rights Advisory Group.
The Committee expresses
its appreciation at the efforts undertaken to include human rights education
within the curricula of secondary schools and higher educational establishments,
and that human rights training programmes are being organized for the
security forces.
4. Principal subjects of concern
The Committee considers
that the domestic legal system of Sri Lanka contains neither all the
rights set forth in the Covenant nor all the necessary safeguards to
prevent their restriction beyond the limits established by the Covenant.
It notes also that the Government does not appear to be considering
the incorporation of all Covenant rights into domestic law or the ratification
of the Optional Protocol; individuals are thus unable to invoke all
the rights conferred under the Covenant before national courts or before
the Human Rights Committee.
The Committee is of the
opinion that the time-limit of two years proposed in the draft new Constitution
for challenging the validity of enacted legislation with the Constitution
is a matter of serious concern. Equally, the Committee expresses its
concern with respect to the provisions of article 16 (1) of the Constitution,
which permits all existing laws to remain valid and operative notwithstanding
any inconsistency with the Constitution's provisions relating to fundamental
rights.
With regard to the recent
establishment of various mechanisms for protecting and promoting human
rights, the Committee appreciates the undertaking of these initiatives
but remains concerned as to whether sufficient attention is being given
to the coordination of the work of the respective committees, commissions
and the Human Rights Task Force so as to avoid any duplication of efforts
and thus maximize the effectiveness of their work.
The Committee is concerned
that the derogation of rights under the various emergency laws and regulations
may not be in full compliance with the requirement of the provisions
of article 4, paragraph 2, of the Covenant. It is further concerned
that courts do not have the power to examine the legality of the declaration
of emergency and of the different measures taken during the state of
emergency. The Committee emphasizes that the obligations assumed by
Sri Lanka as a State party to various international instruments must
be respected even in times of states of emergency.
With reference to article
6 of the Covenant, the Committee is concerned that under Sri Lankan
law, the death penalty may be imposed for crimes such as abetting suicide,
drug-related offences, and certain offences against property. Some of
these offences do not appear to be the most serious offences under article
6 of the Covenant.
The Committee is seriously
concerned about the information received of cases of loss of life of
civilians, disappearances, torture, and summary executions and arbitrary
detention caused by both parties in conflict. The Committee notes with
particular concern that an effective system for the prevention and punishment
of such violations does not appear to exist. In addition, concern is
expressed that violations and abuses allegedly committed by police officers
have not been investigated by an independent body, and that frequently
the perpetrators of such violations have not been punished. The Committee
notes that this may contribute to an atmosphere of impunity among the
perpetrators of human rights violations and constitute an impediment
to the efforts being undertaken to promote respect for human rights.
With respect to the functions
of the three Presidential Commissions of Inquiry into Involuntary Removals
and Disappearances, the Committee is concerned that the Commissions
are not mandated to inquire into such human rights violations allegedly
committed between 1984 and 1988 nor into summary executions.
The Committee is concerned
that the undetermined detention which may be ordered by the Secretary
of the Ministry of Defence violates the Covenant, particularly when
such detention can be challenged only one year after detention. In view
of this, the Committee remains concerned about the effectiveness of
the habeas corpus remedy in respect of those arrested under the Prevention
of Terrorism Act.
The Committee is concerned
that the rights under article 10 of the Covenant of persons deprived
of their liberty in prisons and other places of detention are not fully
respected. It regrets that conditions in places of detention other than
prisons are not regulated by law and that prisons and other places of
detention are not regularly visited by magistrates or other independent
bodies.
With respect to the independence
of the judiciary, the Committee expresses its concern about the procedure
set forth under article 107 of the Constitution read with standing orders
made by Parliament.
The low age of criminal
responsibility and the stipulation within the Penal Code by which a
child above 8 years of age and under 12 years of age can be held to
be criminally responsible on the determination by the judge of the child's
maturity of understanding as to the nature and consequence of his or
her conduct are matters of profound concern to the Committee.
The provisions of the Special
Presidential Commissions of Inquiry Act which permit the acceptance
of evidence otherwise inadmissible in a court of law and which stipulate
that any decision adopted by a Commission established under the Act
is final and conclusive and may not be called into question by any court
and tribunal are matters of serious concern to the Committee in view
of the fact that the findings of these Commissions can lead to a penalty
of civic disability being imposed by Parliament on those subject to
an investigation.
The Committee is also concerned
that Article 15 (2) of the Constitution allows the right to freedom
of expression to be restricted in relation to parliamentary privilege,
particularly in view of the fact that the Parliament (Power and Privileges)
Act as amended in 1978 gives Parliament the power to impose penalties
for breaches of this Act. The Committee is also concerned with the proposed
amendments in the Constitution which seek to restrict the right to freedom
of expression, "in the interest of the authority of Parliament",
which would be in violation of article 19 of the Covenant. It is equally
concerned that government ownership and control over much of the electronic
media might undermine the right of everyone to seek, receive or impart
information and ideas of all kinds.
The Committee notes that
the workers employed in the free trade zones, 80 per cent of whom are
women, are unable, in practice, to enjoy fully the rights set forth
in articles 21 and 22 of the Covenant.
While the Committee welcomes
the proposed changes to legislation for offences committed against children,
such as incest and the sexual exploitation of children, it is concerned
about the situation of the economic and sexual exploitation of children
both with respect to the use of children in domestic service and the
prostitution of boys.
The Committee notes that
reforms are in place to raise the marriageable age for girls to 18.
However, the current legislation permits the marriage of girls from
the age of 12 and contains discriminatory provisions with regard to
property between men and women, thus preventing women from fully enjoying
the rights protected under articles 3, 23, paragraph 3 and 26 of the
Covenant.
5. Suggestions and recommendations
The Committee strongly
recommends that the State party take urgent steps to ensure that its
domestic laws are in full compliance with the Covenant. In this regard,
it further recommends that within the context of the present efforts
to reform the Constitution due consideration be given to the provisions
of the Covenant.
The Committee recommends
that the State party consider acceding to the Optional Protocol.
The Committee notes the
efforts being undertaken by the Government to establish various mechanisms
to promote and protect human rights, including with respect to the National
Human Rights Commission. In this regard, the Committee would like strongly
to recommend that the proliferation of bodies with parallel competences
should be avoided and that the coordination of such mechanisms should
be ensured. It also urges the State party to take into account that
investigation and prosecution of criminal offences should be carried
out by an independent body and that punishment of criminal offences
should be carried out by the judiciary.
The Committee recommends
that the State party review the provision of article 16 of the Constitution
which permits all existing laws to remain valid and operative notwithstanding
any inconsistency with constitutional stipulations relating to fundamental
rights. It also recommends that the two-year time-limit for challenging
the constitutionality of enacted legislations should be abolished.
The Committee recommends
that the provisions of the Covenant should be fully respected in the
areas where a state of emergency has been proclaimed. The Committee
also urges the State party vigorously to investigate all violations
of human rights - both past and present - through an independent agency,
to punish those guilty of such acts and to compensate the victims.
The Committee recommends
that the State party ensure that the death penalty may only be imposed
for the most serious of crimes as required by article 6 of the Covenant.
Moreover, in view of the fact that the death penalty has not been carried
out since 1977, the Committee wishes further to recommend that the State
party consider taking measures for the abolition of the death penalty
and the ratification of or accession to the second Optional Protocol.
Noting that the definition
of torture given in the Convention Against Torture Act passed by Parliament
on 25 November 1994 is somewhat restrictive, the Committee recommends
that the Act be amended to bring it into conformity with article 7 of
the Covenant, taking into account the Committee's General Comment No.
20(44). It further recommends that in view of the statement by the Government
that corporal punishment has been suspended the provisions of the domestic
legislation allowing this form of punishment be revoked.
With regard to articles
9 and 10 of the Covenant, the Committee recommends that as a matter
of priority all legal provisions or executive orders be reviewed to
ensure their compatibility with the provisions of the Covenant and their
effective implementation in practice.
The Committee recommends
that the State party review the existing procedure relating to the removal
of Supreme Court judges and judges of the Courts of Appeal with a view
to its amendment as a means of ensuring the greater independence of
the judiciary.
The Committee recommends
the amendment of the Special Presidential Commissions of Inquiry Act
to bring it into conformity with the provisions of articles 14 and 25
of the Covenant.
The Committee recommends
that the present provisions by which freedom of the press can be restricted
by reason of parliamentary privilege should be removed. The State party
should also take the necessary steps to prevent control and manipulation
of the electronic media by the Government.
With respect to the implementation
of article 22, the Committee recommends that the State party ensure
that workers within the free trade zones effectively exercise their
right to organize.
The Committee recommends
that measures be taken to ensure the protection of the child and in
this regard the particular attention of the State party is drawn to
the Personal Status Act, which permits the marriage of a girl at the
age of 12, and its incompatibility with the provisions of the Covenant.
The Committee urges the
State party to develop a comprehensive programme to deal with the issues
of child labour, particularly of children in domestic service, and the
sexual exploitation of children of both sexes.
The Committee strongly
recommends that greater efforts be undertaken to ensure that all ethnic
groups are provided with the opportunity to participate fully in the
conduct of public affairs and are ensured equitable access to public
service.
The Committee recommends
that further measures be taken to develop greater awareness of the Covenant;
in particular, law enforcement officials and members of the legal profession
should be made fully cognizant of the provisions of the Covenant.