o

SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE

JOMO KENYATTA ROAD • FREETOWN • SIERRA LEONE

PHONE: +1 212 963 9915 Extension: 178 7000 or +39 0831 257000 or +232 22 295995

FAX: Extension: 178 7001 or +39 0831 257001 Extension: 174 6996 or +232 22 295996

 

 

TRIAL CHAMBER II

 

 

Before:	Justice Richard Lussick, Presiding Judge Justice Teresa Doherty Justice Julia Sebutinde
Registrar:	Lovemore G. Munlo, SC
Date:	4 May 2006
PROSECUTOR	Against	Alex Tamba Brima Brima Bazzy Kamara Santigie Borbor Kanu (Case No.SCSL-04-16-T)

 

DECISION ON JOINT DEFENCE REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM DECISION ON DEFENCE MOTIONS FOR JUDGEMENT OF ACQUITTAL PURSUANT TO RULE 98 OF 31 MARCH 2006

 

 

Office of the Prosecutor:		Defence Counsel for Alex Tamba Brima:
Jim Johnson Karim Agha		Kojo Graham Glenna Thompson
		Defence Counsel for Brima Bazzy Kamara: Andrew Daniels Mohamed Pa-Momo Fofanah
		Defence Counsel for Santigie Borbor Kanu: Geert-Jan Alexander Knoops Carry Knoops Abibola E. Manly-Spain

trial chamber II (“Trial Chamber”) of the Special Court for Sierra Leone (“Special Court”), composed of Justice Richard Lussick, presiding, Justice Teresa Doherty and Justice Julia Sebutinde;

SEISED of the Joint Defence Request for Leave to Appeal from Decision on Defence Motions for Judgement of Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 98 of 31 March 2006 (“Motion”), filed on 3 April 2006, in which the Joint Defence seeks leave to appeal from the Trial Chamber’s Decision on Defence Motions for Judgement of Acquittal, of 31 March 2006;

NOTING the Prosecution Response to ‘Joint Defence Request for Leave to Appeal from Decision on Defence Motions for Judgement of Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 98 of 31 March 2006’ (“Response”), filed on 25 April 2006, in which the Prosecution requests that the Trial Chamber dismiss the Joint Defence Motion;

NOTING the Joint Defence Reply to Prosecution Response to Joint Defence Request for Leave to Appeal from Decision on Defence Motions for Judgement of Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 98 of 31 March 2006 (“Reply”), filed on 1 May 2006;

RECALLING the Decision on Defence Motions for Judgement of Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 98, dated 31 March 2006;[1]

NOTING that Rule 73(B) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence (“Rules”) provides that

Decisions rendered on such motions are without interlocutory appeal. However, in exceptional circumstances and to avoid irreparable prejudice to a party, the Trial Chamber may give leave to appeal. Such leave should be sought within 3 days of the decision and shall not operate as a stay of proceedings unless the Trial Chamber so orders;

NOTING that Rule 73(B) of the Rules does not confer a general right of appeal, but that leave to appeal may be granted by the Trial Chamber in cases where the conjunctive conditions of exceptional circumstances and irreparable prejudice to a party are satisfied;

ADOPTING the restrictive  test applied by Trial Chamber I that: “[T]he overriding legal consideration in respect of an application for leave to file an interlocutory appeal is that the applicant’s case must reach a level of exceptional circumstances and irreparable prejudice. Nothing short of that will suffice having regard to the restrictive nature of Rule 73(B) of the Rules and the rationale that criminal trials must not be heavily encumbered and consequently unduly delayed by interlocutory appeals”;[2]

CONSIDERING that the Appeals Chamber has ruled that “In this Court, the procedural assumption is that trials will continue to their conclusion without delay or diversion caused by interlocutory appeals on procedural matters, and that any errors which affect the final judgment will be corrected in due course by this Chamber on appeal”;[3]

THE TRIAL CHAMBER FINDS:

(i)     that the decision in Prosecutor v. Blagojevic et al[4] relied upon by the Defence applies to cases where a  judgement of acquittal has been entered, and is therefore not pertinent to the present case;

(ii)   that, after careful consideration of the other matters raised by the Defence, the criteria of exceptional circumstances and irreparable prejudice prescribed by Rule 73(B) of the Rules have not been met;

AND DISMISSES THE MOTION.

 

 

Done at Freetown, Sierra Leone, this 4^th day of May 2006.

Justice Teresa Doherty	Justice Richard Lussick Presiding Judge	Justice Julia Sebutinde

 

 

[Seal of the Special Court for Sierra Leone]