OPINION No. 23/2003 (CHINA)
Communication addressed to the Government on 11 July 2003.
Concerning: Xu Wenli.
The State has signed but not ratified the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights
1. (Same text as paragraph 1 of opinion No. 20/2003.)
2. The Working Group regrets that the Government has not replied within the 90-day
deadline.
3. (Same text as paragraph 3 of opinion No. 20/2003.)
4. The Working Group regrets that the Government has not provided it with information
about the facts alleged and its position on the merits of the case, despite an invitation to do so.
Nevertheless, the Working Group believes that it is in a position to render an opinion on the facts
and circumstances of the case in the context of the substantiated allegations made.
5. According to the information submitted to the Group Xu Wenli is 60 years old, born
on 1 January 1943, a resident of Beijing, currently being held at Yanqing prison in Beijing,
considered a veteran pro-democracy activist, reportedly suffers from hepatitis B and shows signs
of severe illness. He was arrested on 30 November 1998 at his home by members of the Beijing
Public Security Bureau. A search warrant was presented after his arrest, to his wife, He Xintong,
and his home was searched. Mr. Xu was accused of attempting to establish the Beijing and
Tianjin branches of an organization called the China Democracy Party and was charged with
endangering State security under article 105 of the Criminal Law as amended in March 1997.
6. On 21 December 1998, after a one-day trial that was closed to the public, Xu Wenli was
sentenced to 13 years of imprisonment. He was denied legal representation and forced to present
his own defence.
7. According to the source, since 1982 Xu Wenli has been in and out of prisons and
detention centres as a result of his activities promoting democracy. He has initiated numerous
movements and groups to promote human rights and democracy. Xu Wenli has spent much of
his life, under constant public security surveillance. On 8 June 1982, he was sentenced to
15 years’ imprisonment for “illegally organizing a clique to overthrow the Government�?. He
was released in 1993. After his release, he was repeatedly held for questioning and accused of
violating his parole. Five years later, in 1998, Xu Wenli attempted to officially establish an
independent human rights monitoring group. After his efforts failed and he published two issues
of an unauthorized newsletter, he was held at a Beijing police station for 24 hours and warned
not to publish any material without first seeking official approval.
8. The source further reports that Xu Wenli participated in the 1979-1981 “democracy wall�?
movement. At that time, he helped to launch the April Fifth Forum, a major journal of
dissidence, wrote a 20-point list of suggestions to the Central Committee of the Communist
Party, circulated a private newsletter, gave numerous interviews emphasizing the need for further
democracy in a Marxist society and published several articles in Hong Kong.
9. The source adds that Xu Wenli is in need of immediate medical attention and should be
treated outside prison. He has received only cheap and basic medicines from the prison
authorities and has been denied proper medical treatment for his hepatitis. He has also lost all
his teeth and his hair has turned white.
10. According to the source, Xu Wenli was imprisoned, for having published two
unauthorized issues of a newspaper in March 1998. He has also been imprisoned, in violation of
article 20 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and article 21 of the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, for his efforts to form an independent human rights
monitoring group and the Beijing and Tianjin branches of the China Democracy Party as an
opposition political party, for which he was charged with “endangering State security�?.
11. The source alleges that the detention of Mr. Wu is also in violation of
the 1995 Johannesburg Principles on National Security, Freedom of Expression and
Access to Information, principle 7 of which states that “the peaceful exercise of the right
to freedom of expression shall not be considered a threat to national security or subjected to
any restrictions or penalties�?. According to the source, the authorities’ interpretation of
“State security�? violates both the letter and the spirit of the Johannesburg Principles.
12. The source lastly adds that Xu Wenli’s one-day trial, closed to the public and without
right to a legal defence, was in violation of article 10 of the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights.
13. According to the information received by the Working Group, Xu Wenli, who had
previously been arrested in 1998 for acts of peaceful disobedience against the Government, was
detained again on 30 November 1998. He was judged in only one day. He was not allowed the
assistance of a lawyer and had to present his own defence. He was accused of endangering State
security and was sentenced to 13 years in prison. The charges were based on the fact that since
1998 Xu Wenli had intended to organize a human rights group in China and a political
organization. He had also written articles for an unauthorized magazine, for which he was
warned that he was not allowed to publish any article without previous authorization from the
Government. At present, Xu Wenli is serving his sentence and is very ill.
14. It appears that the activities of Xu Wenli were expressions of the legitimate right
to freedom of expression and association as contained in articles 10, 19 and 20 of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
15. The trial of Xu Wenli failed to respect the minimal norms for a fair trial, because it was
not public and the accused was not allowed the assistance of a lawyer or public defender.
16. In the light of the foregoing, the Working Group renders the following opinion:
The deprivation of liberty of Xu Wenli is arbitrary, being in contravention of
articles 10, 19 and 20 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and falls within
categories II and III of the categories applicable to the consideration of the cases
submitted to the Working Group.
17. Consequent upon the opinion rendered, the Working Group requests the Government to
take the necessary steps to remedy the situation of Xu Wenli. The Working Group also
encourages the Government to ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Adopted on 27 November 2003