OPINION No. 27/1999 (Uzbekistan)
Communication addressed to the Government on 30 March 1999
Concerning Umarkhon Nazarov, Akhmadali Salomov and Abdurashid Nasriddinov
The State is a party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights
1. The Working Group on Arbitrary Detention was established by resolution
1991/42 of the
Commission on Human Rights. The mandate of the Working Group was clarified
and extended
by resolution 1997/50. Acting in accordance with its methods of work,
the Working Group
forwarded to the Government the above-mentioned communication.
2. The Working Group regrets that the Government has not replied within
the 90-day
deadline.
3. The Working Group regards deprivation of liberty as arbitrary in the
following cases:
(i) When it manifestly cannot be justified on any legal basis (such as
continued
detention after the sentence has been served or despite an applicable
amnesty act)
(category I);
(ii) When the deprivation of liberty is the result of a judgement or
sentence for the
exercise of the rights and freedoms proclaimed in articles 7, 13, 14,
18, 19, 20
and 21 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and also, in respect
of
States parties, in articles 12, 18, 19, 21, 22, 25, 26 and 27 of the
International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (category II);
(iii) When the complete or partial non-observance of the international
standards
relating to a fair trial set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights and
in the relevant international instruments accepted by the States concerned
is of
such gravity as to confer on the deprivation of liberty, of whatever
kind, an
arbitrary character (category III).
4. In the light of the allegations made, the Working Group would have
welcomed the
cooperation of the Government. In the absence of any information from
the Government, the
Working Group believes that it is in a position to render an opinion
on the facts and
circumstances of the cases, especially since the facts and allegations
contained in the
communication have not been challenged by the Government.
5. Umarkhon Nazarov, aged 33, Akhmadali Salomov, aged 49, and
Abdurashid Nasriddinov, aged 29, were detained on 28 February and 17
March 1999, and
reportedly charged with “attempting to overthrow the constitutional order
of Uzbekistan�?. It is
alleged that their arrest and detention is part of a clampdown on so-called
“Islamic extremists�?
and others, including the banned political opposition, their families
and associates, whom
President Karimov of Uzbekistan holds responsible for a series of bomb
explosions in
Tashkent on 16 February 1999. All three detained individuals are related
to the independent
Imam Obidkhon Nazarov, who is sought by the Uzbek authorities for promoting
“Wahhabism�?,
an allegedly extreme form of Islam, for preaching illegally and attempting
to establish an Islamic
State.
6. Umarkhon Nazarov is one of the younger brothers of Obidkhon Nazarov
and a citizen of
Kyrgyzstan. On 17 March 1999, he was visiting his uncle, Akhmadali Salomov,
in Namangan,
Uzbekistan, when 15 armed policemen burst into Mr. Salomov’s home, apparently
looking for
Obidkhon Nazarov. Both men were detained on charges of attempting to overthrow
the
constitutional order of Uzbekistan. According to the source, Umarkhon Nazarov
is being held at
the Namangan regional police department. On 22 March 1999, his lawyers
were allowed access
to him, but his family has not been allowed to see him. Akhmadali Salomov
is being held at the
Namangan regional department of internal affairs. It is alleged that he
has not been allowed to
see his lawyer or his family.
7. Abdurashid Nasriddinov is the brother of Obidkhon Nazarov’s wife,
Munira Nasriddinova, who had herself recently been detained for 10 days.
Abdurashid Nasriddinov was arrested on 28 February 1999 in Namangan and
charged with
attempting to overthrow the constitutional order of Uzbekistan and organizing
mass
disturbances. He is said to be held at Namangan prison and to have been
denied access to a
lawyer and to his family.
8. It is reported that the Uzbek authorities are planning to transfer Umarkhon
Nazarov,
Akhmadali Salomov and Abdurashid Nasriddinov to the same detention centre
and to link their
criminal cases, charging them additionally with being members of an armed
criminal gang.
9. According to the source, the Government of Uzbekistan has used the Tashkent
bombings
as a mere pretext to clamp down on perceived sources of opposition to President
Karimov.
Apart from the above-mentioned individuals, numerous other known or suspected
opposition
sympathizers, and suspected members of Islamic congregations, are said
to have been arbitrarily
detained. It is further reported that during the Government’s recent campaign
against the
perceived spread of “Wahhabism�?, several individuals were detained solely
for their alleged
affiliation to independent Islamic congregations.
10. The allegations made by the source have never been refuted by the Government,
although
it had the opportunity to do so.
11. The Working Group observes that the three above-named persons have
been detained
without charge or trial and, in two of the three cases, without the opportunity
to contact their
lawyers or families. These facts constitute a clear violation of articles
9 and 10 of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, articles 9 and 14 of the International
Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights, and principles 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 32 and 33 of the
Body of Principles for the
Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment.
This violation of the
right to a fair trial is of such gravity as to confer an arbitrary character
upon their detention.
12. In the light of the foregoing, the Working Group renders the following
opinion:
The deprivation of the liberty of Umarkhon Nazarov, Akhmadali Salomov and
Abdurashid Nasriddinov is arbitrary, being in contravention of articles
9 and 10 of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, articles 9 and 14 of the International
Covenant
on Civil and Political Rights, and principles 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 32 and
33 of the Body of
Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention
or
Imprisonment, and falls within category III of the principles applicable
to the
consideration of cases submitted to the Working Group.
13. Consequently, the Working Group requests the Government to take the
necessary steps to
remedy the situation and to bring it into conformity with the standards
and principles set forth in
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant
on Civil and Political
Rights.
Adopted on 29 November 1999
E/CN.4/2001/14/Add.1